The Optimizer's Appetite

Privacy began as armor. In the scarcity era, information about you flowed one way, upward, to institutions that could use it against you. The insurer priced your illness, and the employer measured your weaknesses before a negotiation. Hiding was a rational defense against collectors who held power you lacked.

A superintelligence working for you inverts the direction of benefit. The quality of its answers tracks the completeness of what it knows. People already live by this rule in the doctor’s office. A patient tells the doctor what they tell nobody else, because a diagnosis built on half the symptoms is half a diagnosis. The optimizer invites the same candor about the finances, the schedule, the marriage, and the health.

Nobody will mandate the disclosure. People will hand the data over the way they picked up smartphones, one useful trade at a time, because every fact a person withholds from their own intelligence comes back as a worse answer somewhere in their life. The intelligence that spots the predatory loan also flags the dangerous drug interaction, working from the same record.

The personal record is half of the optimizer’s diet. The other half comes from a shared repository of evidence and arguments that every person’s intelligence draws on, where a claim earns its weight by surviving challenge. An answer about your treatment rests on your own history and on every verified result the record holds. When a person adds evidence or connects one argument to another, every optimizer that reads the record answers a little better, and the additions compound toward a more accurate picture of the universe.

Fear of watchers belongs to the scarcity era, when the tools of surveillance sat beyond ordinary reach and the people holding them answered to nobody. Superintelligence puts the same tools in every hand. Whoever looks at you leaves a record of the looking, and your intelligence reads records as well as theirs does. An institution that once collected in secret now collects in front of counterparties with the same reach. Information was dangerous while it flowed one way. The danger fades when the flow runs both ways.

A fully fed optimizer gives the best available answer to every question a person brings. Nobody will mandate the feeding, and nobody will need to. A person hands over the next fact because the last one paid for itself, and a household ends up transparent the way it ended up connected. The appetite belongs to the optimizer. The hunger for better answers belongs to us.

— Chiaroscuro Joven